Selon la rumeur, Buzz sur thinking fast and slow arabic
Selon la rumeur, Buzz sur thinking fast and slow arabic
Blog Article
The best we can do is a compromise: learn to recognize condition in which mistakes are likely and try harder to avoid significant mistakes when the stakes are high.
What a monstrous chore to read! I've been working je this book since September or August (4-6 months) and just could not take reading it intuition more than a few laps at a time. Many times did it put me to sleep.
is kind of like a guest who vue up to your party and then dazzles everyone with année impromptu, 15-temps oration je the geopolitical emploi in South Ossetia; and, everyone applauds and turns to go back to their own conversation, only for the guest to launch into another story about the time they parachuted into the Balkans to break up a nascent civil war, a story which is followed quickly by a similar tale of a visit to Southeast Asia….
The course consists of eight lessons by Nisbett—who comes across nous-mêmes-screen as the authoritative délicat approachable psych professor we all would like to have had—interspersed with some graphics and quizzes.
The Errements of Understanding (204) The sentiment-making machinery of System 1 makes usages see the world as more tidy, élémentaire, predictable, and coherent than it really is. The égarement that Nous has understood the past feeds the further fourvoiement that one can control the prochaine. These égarement are comforting. They reduce the anxiety that we would experience if we allowed ourselves to fully acknowledge the uncertainties of activité. We all have a need expérience the reassuring dépêche that actions have appropriate consequences, and that success will reward wisdom and bravoure.
Another best seller, last year’s The Undoing Project, by Michael Lewis, tells the story of the sometimes contentious collaboration between Tversky and Kahneman. Lewis’s earlier book Moneyball was really embout how his hero, the baseball executive Billy Beane, countered the cognitive biases of old-school avant-garde—notably fundamental attribution error, whereby, when assessing someone’s behavior, we put too much weight nous-mêmes his pépite her personal attributes and too little nous-mêmes external factors, many of which can Lorsque measured with statistics.
And the funny thing is without system 1, we'd won't survive a day in the life. Not to Note we wouldn't act human. System 2 nous the other hand is more introspective, rational and is dégourdi of being aware of the cognitive biases created by System 1. If my understanding is régulier then, we can replicate system 2 by a Instrument pépite artificial entendement. Joli that Mécanique will not have the same extent of morality that we have.... food expérience thought!
Our enthousiaste reactions are remarkably similar, apparently, and I found that I normally reacted to his demande in the way that he predicted. If you are apt to believe that you are a rational person (as I am) it can be quite depressing.
In today’s world, terrorists are the most significant practitioners of the pratique of inducing availability cascades.
What bothered me, rather, was that Kahneman was profuse in diagnosing cognitive errors, plaisant somewhat reticent when it came to the practical ramifications of these jolie, or to strategies to mitigate these errors.
The author's aim is to prove to règles that we are not rational beings to the extent we think we are, that evolution eh seen to that. And that being the compartiment, the book outlines what we need to know so as not to mess up decisions like we have been doing--like we all do.
This is just a short summary of the book, which certainly ut not do équité to the richness of Kahneman’s many insights, examples, and raison. What thinking fast and slow renaud bray can I possibly add? Well, I think I should begin with my few criticisms. Now, it is always possible to criticize the details of psychological experiments—they are artificial, they mainly règles college students, etc.
This is an tragique book. Humanity would Supposé que much improved if these insights could percolate through society and really take hold. Plaisant they probably won’t. Because we’re assholes.
But hasn't he ignored the CHRISTIAN worldview, the world of good and evil? Cognition isn't this book SPIRITUALLY rather trite, being addressed only to those sharpies who only wanna learn how to PLAY THE Jeu?